We’re following up on our previous guidance related to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), its use and misuse. While these technologies present new opportunities, they also raise important considerations around academic integrity, privacy, and security that require thoughtful consideration.
A workgroup examining these tools met over the summer and will continue to meet to craft recommendations and resources for faculty. First and foremost, Chemeketa recognizes that generative AI may be used as part of the teaching and learning process and can be an important part of the curriculum. A blanket restriction of these technologies is not feasible nor is it in keeping with our value of adaptability. With that said, please keep the following in mind:
Security & Privacy
There are important security and privacy issues related to GenAI. Personal identifying information (PII) should never be inputted into these tools. Asking students to create an account may also be problematic if they are required to provide email addresses in order to access its functions. If you plan to use text-based GenAI in your curriculum, use a tool such as Bing Chat which does not require an account for basic functions. For further guidance on GenAI applications and information security, request a consultation with our information security staff.
Syllabus Statements
Clarity supports student success. Be specific about how you expect students to use or not use these tools. Set clear expectations around if and how it can be used for your particular course assignments. Consider this comprehensive list of statements crowdsourced by Lance Eaton, from College Unbound. We also have a curated list of statements for your consideration.
Academic Integrity
Continue to underscore the value of academic integrity for students’ learning and growth. Help students appreciate the rationale for your course assignments – in other words, the “why” you are asking students to do the work. Develop your skills at creating transparent course assignments. If you are allowing students to use generative AI, provide them with guidance for how to do so ethically.
Remember that AI detection tools are not reliable and cannot be used as the sole source for determining academic misconduct. If you suspect the student cheated or plagiarized, follow Chemeketa’s academic honesty procedure and engage in an interactive approach to uncover what took place. For further assistance, talk to your dean and program chair.
The Center for Academic Innovation is working closely with the GenAI workgroup to develop and curate resources and professional development opportunities. Reach out to us with any of your questions and concerns.